Legal Opinion
Vining v. Astrue
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 1, 2010No. Civil 09-269-P-HPublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge.
After oral argument on June 29, 2010, I adopt the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge for the reasons he has stated, with these additional comments on one issue.
At step five of the sequential evaluation process, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4)(v), the burden shifts to the Commissioner to show that there is a significant number of jobs in the national economy that the claimant can perform. Freeman v. Barnhart, 274 F.3d 606, 608 (1st Cir.2001) (citation omitted). The Commissioner can show this by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sanchez v. BerryhillDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2018
- Hamilton v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Arrington v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Amaral v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- Delafontaine v SSADistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2011
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.