Spruill v. Office of the Director of Regulation
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
1Opinion of the Court
GUERNSEY, Chief Judge.
I. BACKGROUND.
On August 5, 2002, the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Commission notified the Plaintiff that his non-gaming license application would not be processed further as a result of his prior criminal history, and that this decision could be appealed to the Director of Regulation. The ensuing appeal, before a Hearing Officer appointed by the Defendant, took place on August 21, 2002. The relevant evidence introduced during the course of this hearing was the Plaintiffs response to a Commission Disclosure form and the Plaintiffs testimony at the hearing. Question 10 of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Ager v. Office of Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
- La Pietra v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
- Figueroa v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2002
3Cited by2 opinions
- Belisle v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2007
- Harris v. Mohegan Election Committee & MembersMohegan Trial Court · 2012