Legal Opinion

Spruill v. Office of the Director of Regulation

Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court

Decided April 23, 2003No. GDTC-AA-02-146PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUERNSEY, Chief Judge.

I. BACKGROUND.

On August 5, 2002, the Mohegan Tribal Gaming Commission notified the Plaintiff that his non-gaming license application would not be processed further as a result of his prior criminal history, and that this decision could be appealed to the Director of Regulation. The ensuing appeal, before a Hearing Officer appointed by the Defendant, took place on August 21, 2002. The relevant evidence introduced during the course of this hearing was the Plaintiffs response to a Commission Disclosure form and the Plaintiffs testimony at the hearing. Question 10 of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bialowas v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
  2. Ager v. Office of Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 1997
  3. La Pietra v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
  4. Figueroa v. Office of the Director of RegulationsMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Belisle v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2007
  2. Harris v. Mohegan Election Committee & MembersMohegan Trial Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API