Belisle v. Office of the Director of Regulation
Mohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LI-MINE/PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO PRESENT ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
GUERNSEY, Chief Judge.
The Defendant, Office of the Director of Regulation, in response to the Pro Se Plaintiff s request to present additional evidence1, filed a Motion in Limine on grounds that the Gaming Disputes Court lacks authority to hear an appeal of a final agency decision de novo. At the hearing on Defendant’s motion, both the issue of a hearing de novo and whether the Defendant should be permitted to present additional evidence before the agency were considered.
For…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Salmon v. Department of Public Health & Addiction ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Montgomery v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Culley v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2006
- Spruill v. Office of the Director of RegulationMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Burnett v. Mohegan Tribal Gaming AuthorityMohegan Gaming Disputes Trial Court · 2013