Legal Opinion
Doe v. Casey
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 16, 1985No. Civ. A. 82-2016PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BARRINGTON D. PARKER, District Judge:
The plaintiff John Doe claims that after nine years of service with the Central Intelligence Agency (“CIA” or “Agency”) his employment was unlawfully terminated because he voluntarily acknowledged to his superior that he had engaged in homosexual practices. Following that disclosure, the CIA Director, William Casey, decided that it was “necessary and advisable in the interests of the United States to terminate [Doe’s] employment ... pursuant to section 102(c) of the National Security Act of 1947 [50 U.S.C. § 401] ,..” 1
John Doe asserts…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Barlow v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- John Doe v. William J. Casey, Director, C.I.A.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
- John Doe v. Robert M. Gates, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Thomas E. Egan v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Bartman v. CheneyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Allied Leather Corp. v. Altama Delta Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.