Legal Opinion

Schindler v. Department of Motor Vehicles

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 23, 1999No. S-98-121PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

Appellant, Jason D. Schindler, asks this court to determine that Neb. Rev. Stat. §§ 60-6,205 (Cum. Supp. 1996) and 60-6,206 to 60-6,208 (Reissue 1993), the administrative license revocation statutes, are unconstitutional because they violate equal protection and constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

Schindler was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, a Class W misdemeanor. After his arrest, Schindler was read the postarrest chemical test advisement and asked to submit to a blood test for alcohol and a urine test for drugs. Schindler refused.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Lesester D. McDougherty AKA Lester JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  3. State v. MichalskiNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. HowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Bauers v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gourley Ex Rel. Gourley v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Chase v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Muir v. Nebraska Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Kenley v. NethNebraska Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Randall v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Court of Appeals · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API