Legal Opinion

Dee Enterprises v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 31, 2003No. 02CA2040PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Chief Judge DAVIDSON.

In this workers’ compensation proceeding, Dee Enterprises and its insurer, Mid-Century Insurance Company (collectively employer), seek review of the final order issued by the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) upholding the order of the administrative law judge (ALJ) finding that Ronald Nations (claimant) had suffered a compensable injury and awarding him benefits. We affirm.

I. Constitutionality

On appeal, employer’s primary contention is that §§ 8-43-201 and 8-43-301, C.R.S. 2002, of the Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), are unconstitutional. Specifically,…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Den Ex Dem. Murray v. Hoboken Land & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Crowe v. TullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
  2. Blood v. Qwest Services Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Colorado Citizens for Ethics in Government v. Committee for American DreamColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. People v. BondurantColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API