Legal Opinion

McGuiness v. Brink's Inc.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 20, 1999No. Civ. Y-98-727PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.

I

This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Ronald W. McGuiness [“McGuiness”], asserts claims of common law negligence, negligent en-trustment, and negligent hiring and retention against the defendant, Brink’s Incorporated [“Brink’s”].

A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is reviewed under the long-established standard that “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Larry Jerome Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina M.N. Barker, Individually and as a City Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Schramm v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
  2. McCullough v. Liberty Heights Health & Rehabilitation CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
  3. Brady v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  4. Dinardo v. It's My Amphitheater, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
  5. Dinardo v. It's My Amphitheater, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API