McGuiness v. Brink's Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, Senior District Judge.
I
This matter is before the Court on the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff, Ronald W. McGuiness [“McGuiness”], asserts claims of common law negligence, negligent en-trustment, and negligent hiring and retention against the defendant, Brink’s Incorporated [“Brink’s”].
A motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim is reviewed under the long-established standard that “a complaint should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim unless it appears beyond doubt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Jenkins v. McKeithenSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Larry Jerome Brooks v. City of Winston-Salem, North Carolina M.N. Barker, Individually and as a City Police OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Scott v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- Henley v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schramm v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2004
- McCullough v. Liberty Heights Health & Rehabilitation CenterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Brady v. Walmart IncDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
- Dinardo v. It's My Amphitheater, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
- Dinardo v. It's My Amphitheater, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.