Legal Opinion
In re the Personal Restraint of Stuhr
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 14, 2016No. 91920-8PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.
¶1 Petitioner Clark Stuhr is in Department of Corrections (DOC) custody, serving two consecutive sentences imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981 (SRA), chapter 9.94A RCW. As penalties for Stuhr’s serious disciplinary infractions, DOC has revoked potentially available good conduct time for both of his sentences. Stuhr contends that this loss of potential good conduct time violates statutory and constitutional law. We disagree and therefore deny relief on his personal restraint petition (PRP).
BACKGROUND
¶2 Stuhr pleaded guilty to first degree murder in 1989 and was given an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bostain v. Food Exp., Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Bostain v. Food Express, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Matter of Personal Restraint of CashawWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Matter of Personal Restraint of WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Colvin v. InsleeWashington Supreme Court · 2020
- In re Pers. Restraint of GronquistWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- In the Matter of the Personal Restraint of: Joshua Kelly PinneyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Dale MaddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Dale MaddenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.