Legal Opinion
MacK v. Armstrong
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 18, 2008No. 26589-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
195 P.3d 1027 (2008)
Morris MACK and Karilee Mack, husband and wife, Respondents,
v.
Byron ARMSTRONG and Laurie Armstrong, husband and wife, Appellants.
No. 26589-7-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3.
November 18, 2008.
Jerome R. Aiken, Attorney at Law, Yakima, WA, for Appellants.
James Ketner Adams Jr., Wagner Luloff and Adams, Yakima, WA, for Respondents.
SWEENEY, J.
¶ 1 Specific provisions of real estate covenants take precedence over more general consent-to-construction provisions of those same covenants. Here, the covenants permitted construction of a residence up to 30 feet in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. DickieWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Riss v. AngelWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Green v. Normandy ParkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Green v. Normandy Park Riviera Section Community Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- McGee v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- LAKEWOOD RACQUET CLUB, INC. v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Lakewood Racquet Club, Inc. v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- Willie Leon McGee v. Pamela PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013