Legal Opinion

Miller v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 24, 2013No. 08CV1672CC; A147325PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Plaintiffs Allen and Kathy Worth and defendant Jones are owners of adjacent properties.1 Plaintiffs brought an action for declaratory relief against defendant, seeking (1) a declaration that a 1999 agreement between plaintiffs’ predecessors-in-interest (the Hopkinses) and defendant’s predecessors-in-interest (the Busbys) created an appurtenant easement granting plaintiffs the right to use, service, and maintain an irrigation pipeline running through defendant’s property or, alternatively, (2) a declaration that plaintiffs have an implied easement to the same effect. The trial court concluded…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Yogman v. ParrottOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tipperman v. TsiatsosOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Bloomfield v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. German Savings & Loan Society v. GordonOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Verzeano v. CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cascade Pacific Pulp, LLC v. Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. Tressel v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Western Property Holdings, LLC v. Aequitas Capital Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  4. Stimson Lumber Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API