Legal Opinion
Clark v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 10, 1993No. 90-CF-1081PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted appellant Richard Clark of three counts of assault with intent to commit robbery while armed, one count of mayhem while armed, one count of possession of a firearm during a crime of violence, and one count of carrying a pistol without a license. See D.C.Code §§ 22-501, -506, - 3202, -3204 (1989 & 1992 Supp.). Appellant challenges his convictions, alleging that the trial court erred in (1) failing to grant a mistrial after government witnesses implicated appellant in “other crimes”; (2) excluding a photo array proffered by the defense; and (3) failing…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nathan L. Drew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Howard v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.