Legal Opinion

Holeman v. City of New London

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 30, 2005No. 184PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

425 F.3d 184

Marion HOLEMAN and Wallace Holeman, Administratrixes of the Estate of Darrel Holeman, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CITY OF NEW LONDON, New London Police Department, Gaspar Vincent Garcia, Bruce Rinehart, Greg Williams and John Doe, Defendants-Appellants,

Office of Adult Probation, State of Ct Judicial Dept. and Dept. of Corrections, State of Ct, Movant.

Docket No. 04-5031-CV.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued: August 22, 2005.

Decided: September 30, 2005.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Daniel C. Demerchant, Howd & Ludorf, Hartford, CT (Thomas R. Gerarde and John J. Radshaw…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. Erickson Meko CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2022
  2. Grice v. McVeighCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Abdul R. MuhammadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. HussainCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
  5. McColley v. County of RensselaerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API