Legal Opinion

MacLarty v. Lortz

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Charles Lambíase, J.

This is a motion brought on by the defendant ‘1 to amend the judgment as entered in the above-entitled action to provide for one judgment, or in the alternative to provide for consolidation of the two judgments as entered and for a retaxation of costs so that only one bill of costs is entered and for such other and different relief as to the Court may seem just and proper.”

The plaintiffs in this action, represented by the same counsel, in a single summons and complaint have sued their respective causes of action. Plaintiffs were successful upon the trial of the action and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Akely v. . KinnicuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Merten v. Queen Rental Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. Miranda v. WitteNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Cammer v. ConnollyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Atlas v. HotchkissNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API