Legal Opinion

Young v. Curgil

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 18, 1978No. 76-2328, 76-2329PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

358 So.2d 58 (1978)

Betty YOUNG, Appellant,

v.

Lee H. CURGIL et al., Appellees.

Earma WILLIAMS, Appellant,

v.

Lee H. CURGIL et al., Appellees.

Nos. 76-2328, 76-2329.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 18, 1978.

Rehearing Denied May 19, 1978.

Law Offices of Joseph Rosenkrantz and Jerold Hart and Stuart H. Abramson, Miami Beach, for appellants.

Blackwell, Walker, Gray, Powers, Flick & Hoehl and James E. Tribble, Talburt, Kubicki & Bradley and Betsy E. Hartley, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, NATHAN and HUBBART, JJ.

HUBBART, Judge.

The plaintiffs Betty Young and Earma Williams…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rhea v. HackneySupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  2. Parham v. KohlerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Horjales v. LoebDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jacob v. HendersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  2. Tri Star Investments, Inc. v. MieleDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Eppes v. SnowdenDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1986
  4. Distefano v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. O'VAHEY v. MillerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API