Legal Opinion

Stack v. Boyle, United States Marshal

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 3, 1951No. 13099PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants1 were indicted for violating § 3 of the Smith Act,2 were allowed bail by District Judge Mathes in the sum of $50,000 each and, in default of furnishing such bail, were detained in the custody of appellee, United States Marshal James J. Boyle. Alleging that the bail required of them was excessive, appellants petitioned the District Court for writs of habeas corpus. Orders to show cause were issued, returns were filed, a hearing was had before District Judge Harrison, an order was entered denying the petitions, and appellants have appealed from the order. We…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Johnson v. HoySupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Skeffington v. KatzeffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1922
  4. Colyer v. SkeffingtonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1920
  5. Alexander v. United States and Nine Other TitlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stack v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. United States v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  4. Forest v. United States. Sentner v. United States. Manewitz v. United States. Murphy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1953
  5. Heikkinen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API