Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael O'ShaughneSSy

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 30, 1985No. 85-2360PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael O’Shaughnessy appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for revocation of a pretrial detention order. Because the “first appearance” requirement of 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f) was not met, we REVERSE the order of the district court and REMAND for further proceedings in accordance with the Bail Reform Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq.

I

On March 23, 1985, two fragmentation grenades exploded outside the Houston office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. In connection with that bombing, on April 23, 1985, the Government indicted Michael O’Shaughnessy and others,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Rubin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Donald PaydenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Antonio Jose Hurtado, Mark Anthony Olson, Diego Alonzo Flores-Soto, Hector Albert Rua and Jose Pita AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  2. Lawrence Allen Fassler v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  3. United States v. Antonio Dominguez and Roberto RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Fleet Wallace MaullCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  5. United States v. Albert Samuel Fortna, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API