Legal Opinion
Grigg v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided February 9, 2023No. 4:21-cv-03124Unknown
1Opinion
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA CHARLIE GRIGG, and CHARLES WALDSCHMIDT, 4:21CV3124 Plaintiffs, 8:22CV210 vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO., Defendant This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion to compel, Filing No. 82.1 The motion is more properly construed as a motion for partial summary judgment on a question of law.2 The plaintiffs in these consolidated putative class action cases allege that defendant Union Pacific Railroad (“U.P.” or “the Raiload”) discriminates against hearing- impaired employees through its hearing-exam and hearing-protection rules. Filing…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Thomasina Mack v. The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.