Legal Opinion
Pellicer v. Brotherhood of Ry. & S.S. Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided November 16, 1953No. Civ. A. 2591-JPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMPSON, District Judge.
Plaintiff is an employee at Jacksonville, Florida, of the defendant Railway Express Agency and a member of the craft of clerks, freight handlers, express and station employees. Defendant Brotherhood of Railway and Steamship Clerks is the collective bargaining representative under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., of the members of this craft. The wages, rules, and working conditions applicable to plaintiff’s employment are established and governed by a bargaining agreement between the Express Company and the Brotherhood.
By this action plaintiff seeks,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Slocum v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Order of Railway Conductors and Brakemen and Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Switchmen's Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Fagan v. Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1959
- F. R. Pellicer v. Brotherhood Of Railway And Steamship ClerksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Napier v. System Federation No. 91District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1955
- Pellicer v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.