Legal Opinion

Pellicer v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1954No. 14859PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLMES, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by a railway-agency employee to have enjoined as unlawful an amendment to a bargaining agreement that modified his seniority rights by integration of colored employees with other employees. The action was instituted in a state court and removed to the federal district court. The motion to dismiss was granted because the complaint failed to state a cause of action. The question presented is whether the amendment was unlawful under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., and the federal Constitution.

The plaintiff contends that the amendment was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pellicer v. Brotherhood of Ry. & S.S. Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station EmployeesDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. F. R. Pellicer v. Brotherhood Of Railway And Steamship ClerksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  2. Whitfield v. United Steelworkers of America, Local No. 2708District Court, S.D. Texas · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API