Legal Opinion

Napier v. System Federation No. 91

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 22, 1955No. Civ. No. 2300PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBOURNE, Chief Judge.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The plaintiffs seek relief from *876certain provisions of two collective bargaining agreements executed by and between the Louisville and Nashville Railroad and System Federation No. 91, Railway Employee’s Department, American Federation of Labor, herein referred to as the A. F. of L. The provisions in issue relate to seniority rights of a group of employees of the L & N Railway, classified as Laborers. In effect, the plaintiffs allege that they have been laid off by the defendant carrier through recent reductions in work force by…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Tunstall v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Alameda County Management Employees Ass'n v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  2. Rakestraw v. United Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API