Legal Opinion

Rubin v. Polunsky

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 6, 1963No. 14072PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARROW, Justice.

This is a suit by landlords of business property to collect rent allegedly owed for the last six months of a three-year extension agreement, or, in the alternative, for a holding over under the original lease. After a non-jury trial, judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiffs for the sum of $1,500.00, which the trial court found defendant owes under either theory.

There are some undisputed facts: Ap-pellees are Maurice B. Polunsky, Joe Sign-off and Sam Mazer, and the wife of each. The three men were appointed as independent executors of the estate of their father-in-law, Max…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Martin v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Burke v. ShaferCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  3. Chavez v. GoodmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  4. Roberts v. StuartTexas Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chavez v. AberDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2015
  2. Sauvain v. Acceptance Indemnity Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Capital Bank v. American Eyewear, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  4. Morgan v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  5. Velasquez v. SchuehleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API