Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Stuart

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1891No. 3086PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The opinion contains a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge.

The first assignment of error is that “the court erred in overruling plaintiffs’ demurrer and exceptions to defendant’s first amended answer, because it was not responsive to plaintiff’s petition in that for answer it is alleged that defendant on the 23d day of January, 1888, eight days after the death of Mrs. Ann R. Buckley, filed his petition to probate the will of Mrs. Buckley, and on the 8th day of March, 1888, Mrs. Mary L. Robinson filed her contest of the probate of the will, which continued till the — day of April, 1889, all of which is wholly immaterial, irrelevant) and…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Morrell v. HamlettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Warne v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Barfield v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Anderson v. CaulkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Rubin v. PolunskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API