Legal Opinion

Capital Bank v. American Eyewear, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 19, 1980No. 20174PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUITTARD, Chief Justice.

In this suit for a declaratory judgment, the trial court, without a jury, found that a certain document bearing the signatures of both parties was a valid and binding lease to plaintiff American Eyewear, Inc. from defendant Capital Bank. The bank appeals on several grounds, of which we consider only two. We hold that the document is not effective as a lease under the Statute of Frauds, Tex.Bus. & Comm.Code Ann. § 26.-01 (Vernon 1968), because the substance of the document was changed after it was signed by the bank’s president, and the bank’s agreement to the lease…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Ford v. CulbertsonTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chastain v. Cooper & ReedTexas Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Robertson v. MeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Morris v. GainesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Clegg v. BrannanTexas Supreme Court · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Garrod Investments, Inc. v. Schlegel, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
  2. Blakeney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  3. Richard F. Kiepfer, M.D. v. Barry M. Beller, Etc., American Physicians Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  4. Agri Export Cooperative v. Universal Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1991
  5. Khoury v. TomlinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API