Herring v. Texaco, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
¶1 — In a bankruptcy action, a potential creditor is entitled to actual notice of the debtor’s bankruptcy if the debtor can reasonably identify the potential creditor and his or her claim through the debtor’s reasonably diligent efforts. This means that the debtor must have in his or her possession some specific information suggesting both the claim for which and the entity to which it would be liable. At *481the time Todd Shipyards Corporation (Todd) filed for bankruptcy, it knew that members of the Asbestos Workers Union Local No. 7 (Local 7) who had worked at Todd could reasonably be expected…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Grannis v. OrdeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Herring v. Texaco, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Herring v. Texaco, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
- Herring v. Texaco, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2006