(PC) Fialho v. Auld
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SCOTT FRANK FIALHO, No. 2:21-cv-1698 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 AULD, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. Before the court is plaintiff’s complaint for 18 screening and plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. For the reasons set forth below, 19 this court grants plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, grants petitioner leave to file an 20 amended complaint based on his Eighth Amendment claims, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.