Legal Opinion

US ON BEHALF OF & FOR USE OF BALF v. Casle Corp.

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided August 10, 1995No. 3:94-cv-00162Published

1Opinion of the Court

895 F.Supp. 420 (1995)

UNITED STATES of America, on Behalf of and for the Use of the BALF CO., Plaintiff,

v.

The CASLE CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

No. 3:94-cv-162(DJS).

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

August 10, 1995.

Thomas F. Morgan, Robert Berman Shapiro, Cohn & Birnbaum, P.C., Hartford, CT, for plaintiff.

Gerald L. Garlick, Linda Clifford Hadley, David G. Chabot, Leventhal, Krasow & Roos, P.C., Hartford, CT, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SQUATRITO, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Use Plaintiff, the Balf Co. ("Balf"), filed this action against Defendants, the Casle…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Oliveri v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  5. Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API