Legal Opinion

AUTUMN JOURNEY HOSPICE, INC. v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 3, 2010No. Civil Action 09-2403 (RMU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Overruling the Defendant’s Objection to the Plaintiff’s Related Case Designation; Denying the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss

RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

The plaintiff is a hospice care provider participating in Medicare, a federal pro gram administered by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”). It commenced this action pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 553 et seq., challenging HHS’s demands for repayment of funds distributed to the plaintiff purportedly in excess of the lawful cap on such distributions. Because…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
  2. Dale v. Executive Office of the PresidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000
  3. Tripp v. Executive Office of PresidentDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2000

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Singh v. McConvilleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. Committee on Judiciary v. McGahnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Volvo Construction Equipment AbDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. TrumpDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
  5. Committee on the Judiciary of the U.S. House of Representives v. McGahn IIDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API