Legal Opinion

Davidson v. Auwerda

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Lee District Court. — W. S. Hamilton, Judge. AotioN in equity, to compel the specific performance of a contract for the sale of real estate. Decree for plaintiff. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

A written contract was entered into August 22, 1921, between plaintiff and B. L. Auwerda, doing business as Sullivan & Auwerda, by which plaintiff agreed to sell defendant for $22,000 a certain lot, a store property, in the city of Keokuk. By the terms of the contract, plaintiff was to furnish an abstract showing the title of said property to be merchantable, and to give a good and sufficient warranty deed. The execution of the contract was admitted; but defendants denied that the abstract furnished by plaintiff shows such title as was required, because the abstract shows that plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mandlebaum v. McDonellMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  2. McCleary v. EllisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Teany v. MainsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  4. Travis v. SitzTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Robinson v. RandolphSupreme Court of Florida · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. MorseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Goodman v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  3. Sisters of Mercy v. LightnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Bogenrief v. LawSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  5. Jones v. CoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API