United Talking Machine Co. v. Metcalfe
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Thomas
Reversing.
The appellee (defendant) was a dry goods merchant at Central City, Kentucky, and on the 23d day of January, 1913, he executed the writing sued on, which, among other things, is an order, to appellant (plaintiff) for thirteen symphony, hornless talking machines, together with records, needles and other attachments necessary for their use. One of the machines was to be sent immediately by express from the Chicago office of the plaintiff, which was done, and the other twelve were to be shipped by freight from Bridgeport, Connecticut, the place of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Upton v. TribilcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Western Manufacturing Co. v. CottonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- United Talking Machine Co. v. MetcalfCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Case Mill Manufacturing Co. v. VickersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Clark v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. LeaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Mayo Arcade Corporation v. Bonded Floors Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Kentucky Road Oiling Co. v. SharpCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
- McGuffin v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.