Hood v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The defendant was convicted of violations of the Federal Narcotic Act (26 USCA § 211 and § 691 et seq.), there being two counts of the indictment.
The trial court overruled demurrers leveled at each count of the indictment, and error is assigned on such rulings. The defendant’s main contention is that neither count sufficiently identifies or “earmarks” the offense charged. It is settled law in this circuit that in charging an offense of general character, it is necessary to allege some fact or circumstance which will identify the particular offense charged sufficiently…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Blitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dealy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Samuels v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- Caldwell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Craig v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Reger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
- Hursh v. KillitsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Beach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.