Legal Opinion

Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,775 Leo P. McCurnin Jr. v. Kohlmeyer & Company and Jack D. Drake

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 13, 1973No. 72-3175PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Per curiam

Federal jurisdiction over this case initially was grounded upon a joinder of claims arising under the Commodities Exchange Act, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 with a diversity claim arising under the Louisiana law of agency. The trial court below determined that none of the customer’s (Appellee) federal claims had merit, 1 but, it asserted pend ent jurisdiction over the state claim 2 and proceeded to find that the customer was entitled to recovery from the broker (Appellant) under prevailing Louisiana law. We affirm.

The dispute between the parties arose out…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McCurnin v. Kohlmeyer & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1972

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Leist v. SimplotCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Glenn Hill v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields Incorporated, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  3. First Commodity Corp. Of Boston and Richard Badoian v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and John RuddyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,368 Joe G. Moody v. Bache & Co., Incorporated and Bob PetersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  5. Karlen v. Ray E. Friedman & Co. CommoditiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API