Wharen v. Markle Banking & Trust Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Hibt, J.,
Opinion by
White Haven Knitting Company gave a mortgage to defendant Trust Company to secure a bond issue and, with the mortgage, delivered to this trustee certain policies of fire insurance each of which contained the following endorsement: “Loss, if any, on building only, payable to Markle Banking & Trust Company as interest may appear, subject, nevertheless, to all the conditions of this policy.” Thereafter in January 1929, the Knitting Company became insolvent and receivers, also named as defendants herein, were appointed by a U. S. District Court. On insolvency the receivers…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Overholt Et Ux. v. Reliance Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. RuddyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Knights of Joseph B. & L. Ass'n v. Mechanics' Fire Ins.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
- German Insurance Co. of Freeport v. HaydenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- Continental Insurance v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Century Insurance Agency, Inc. v. City Commerce Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Conner v. Northwestern National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- General Credit Corp. v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Allcorn v. Commonwealth Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Benchoff v. Western Mutual Fire Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1954
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.