Legal Opinion

Dikeman v. Snell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1973No. B-3362PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*184DANIEL, Justice.. Relator, M. M. Dikeman, has petitioned this Court to issue a writ of mandamus requiring District Judge John N. Snell, Jr., to set aside a nunc pro tunc judgment entered on January 5, 1972, making certain changes in a previous judgment rendered by Judge Snell against Relator on March 29, 1971. Respondent, Charles L. Palmer, originally brought this suit against Dikeman to remove restrictions which prevented the use of Palmer’s property for commercial purposes. Palmer won a favorable jury verdict, but Judge Snell’s judgment of March 29, 1971, for Palmer contained a proviso,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McEwen v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Fulton v. FinchTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Comet Aluminum Company v. DibrellTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Lone Star Cement Corporation v. FairTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Knox v. LongTexas Supreme Court · 1953

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Brady v. Fourteenth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Hooks v. Fourth Court of AppealsTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. in Re Paul & Cynthia Elizondo and Eagle Fabricators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  4. Texas Department of Transportation and City of Edinburg v. A.P.I. Pipe and Supply, L.L.C. and Paisano Service Company, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Mathes v. KeltonTexas Supreme Court · 1978

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API