Mathes v. Kelton

CHADICK, Justice.

Mrs. Rose Mathes brought this suit for the return of a diamond ring and several pieces of furniture alleged to be owned by her and wrongfully held by Mrs. Etta Kel-ton. Mrs. Kelton filed a cross-action for judgment on a promissory note executed by Mrs. Mathes and for foreclosure on the ring which was pledged as security for the note. At the conclusion of the nonjury trial, the trial judge orally rendered judgment. He ordered Mrs. Kelton to return the furniture to Mrs. Mathes and gave Mrs. Kelton judgment against Mrs. Mathes on the note. Concerning the ring, the statement of…