Legal Opinion

Brown v. City of Thomasville

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1923No. 3425PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBussell, C. J.

(After stating the .foregoing facts.)

The first question raised by the brief and argument of counsel is whether the plaintiff should have proceeded to protect her rights by petition for mandamus rather than by injunction. It is well settled that as a general rule a court of equity will not restrain by injunction a threatened prosecution for a violation of .a municipal penal ordinance, nor in a proceeding for such injunction will it inquire into the validity-of the ordinance. Jones v. Carlton, 146 Ga. 1 (90 S. E. 278), Steinberg v. Savannah, 149 Ga. 69 (99 S. E. 36). However, there is an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cutsinger v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
  2. Hewin v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Mayor of Shellman v. SaxonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  4. Peginis v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Baldwin v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Chaires v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  2. McKown v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  3. Morrow v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  4. City of Macon v. SamplesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Corley v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API