James v. Vigilant Insurance Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
COUNTISS, Justice.
This is a declaratory judgment case, brought by an insurance company to determine whether it must defend an employee of its insured. The trial court rendered judgment non obstante verdicto for the insurance company, concluding that the employee was not insured and relieving the insurance company of responsibility for defending him. The employee and those who are suing him attack that judgment by eight points of error in this Court. We affirm.
Geary Craig James, employee of an Amarillo magazine and book distributor, had two wrecks in a company van, damaging City of Amarillo…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Dowling v. NADW Marketing, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1982
- Coronado v. Employers' National Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
- TM Productions, Inc. v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Republic Bankers Life Ins. Co. v. HerringCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
3Cited by11 opinions
- GXG, INC. v. Texacal Oil & Gas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1998
- City of El Paso v. W.E.B. Investments, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1997
- City of Lubbock v. Corbin, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. RagatzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. CallejoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.