Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Lavigne

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1894No. 19394PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This is an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon a dwelling-house and the land adjacent thereto, taken under the Code of Civil Procedur'e, to secure the sum of sixty dollars, due the plaintiffs as copartners and as original contractors for moving the house upon which the lien is claimed from San Diego to the ranch described in the complaint.

Plaintiffs had judgment of foreclosure, from which judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial defendants appeal.

The defendants are husband and wife, and the real estate upon which the lien was foreclosed is the homestead of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Malone v. Big Flat Gravel Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Mendocino County v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Cox v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Aliso Water Co. v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Trask v. SearleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bagnell Timber Co. v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  2. San Francisco Sulphur Co. v. Aetna Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1909
  3. Star Mill and Lumber Co. v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Harbridge v. Six Points Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Diamond Match Co. v. Sanitary Fruit Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API