MacKey v. Boswell
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Action by D. B. Boswell and another against O. A. Mackey. There was a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHardy, J.
Plaintiff in error was defendant, and defendants in error were plaintiffs, in the trial court, and for convenience parties will be referred to as they there appeared.
This was an action to recover upon an account for goods, wares, and merchandise. Defendant filed an amended answer which alleged that about the - day of April, 1011, he made a contract with plaintiffs to furnish him with groceries and other necessary provisions to run him during the full crop season, spring, summer, and fall, and until the crops were gathered, including sufficient supplies for a man working for defendant upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jones v. GeorgeTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Skagit Railway & Lumber Co. v. ColeWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- Atlanta & Birmingham A. L. Ry. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Rice v. WhitmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Twyman v. RoellSupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Young v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Fiegel v. First Nat. Bank of KingfisherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Franklin v. WardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Cushman Motor Works Co. v. KelleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.