Schoelles v. Zausmer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for money loaned to respondents, the appeal is from an order granting a motion under section 190-a of the Civil Practice Act to remove said action to the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. It appears from the complaint that respondents are also executors of a decedent’s estate. The amended answer alleges that the loans were made under an agreement that the estate would be liable for payment thereof and that the estate has made payment to the appellant. It further appears that two other proceedings…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of LainezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Museum v. American Ass'n of MuseumsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- In re the Estate of JemzuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- In re the Estate of LainezNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979