Legal Opinion

Schoelles v. Zausmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for money loaned to respondents, the appeal is from an order granting a motion under section 190-a of the Civil Practice Act to remove said action to the Surrogate’s Court, Nassau County. Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs. It appears from the complaint that respondents are also executors of a decedent’s estate. The amended answer alleges that the loans were made under an agreement that the estate would be liable for payment thereof and that the estate has made payment to the appellant. It further appears that two other proceedings…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re the Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LainezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Museum v. American Ass'n of MuseumsNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. In re the Estate of JemzuraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. In re the Estate of LainezNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API