City of Milwaukee v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.
It is the contention of the appellant that the deceased was not performing services growing out of and incidental to his employment at the time of the accident. It is manifest that he entered upon his employment when he reported at the tool house and obtained the tools with which he was to work during the day. Appellant contends, however, that he should have followed the cinder roadway rather than the railroad track in proceeding from the tool house to the place of work. The evidence shows that employees similarly engaged followed either the roadway or the railroad track, as best suited their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Monroe County v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flanagan v. Webster & WebsterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Howes v. Stark Bros. Nurseries & Orchards Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1930
- Murdoch v. Humes SwanstromIdaho Supreme Court · 1931
- Caravella v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- McCollum v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.