Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Fugina v. Pierce

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1926PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed June 21, 1926:

Eschweiler, J.

Upon the first objection urged by defendant to these proceedings, namely, that this court ought *3not to exercise its original jurisdiction in quo warranto, we are of the opinion that the situation presented, namely, an application by the attorney general of the state of Wisconsin under ch. 294, Stats., to inquire into the right or title of one acting as .a county judge in this, state, though a proceeding which might have been brought in the first instance in a circuit court of the state and subject to review here, still is one in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Miller Scrap Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1919
  2. People ex. rel. Hughes v. MayMichigan Supreme Court · 1855
  3. State v. RussellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  4. In re the Motion to Admit Mosness to the Bar of this CourtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  5. State ex rel. Attorney General v. MessmoreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. In re StolenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  2. In re HeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Phagan v. State Ex Rel. EyssenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  4. Dorf v. SkolnikCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Smith v. BohannanArizona Supreme Court · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API