Bowman v. Holman
Oregon Supreme Court
From Circuit Court of Multnomah County. Action by Benjamin H. Bowman against George P. Holman. Plaintiff appeals from an order setting aside a default order in his favor. Defendant now moves to dismiss the appeal.
1Per curiam
On September 5, 1905, plaintiff recovered a judgment against the defendant by default in an action at law. On February 10, 1906, the judgment was, on defendant’s application, under Section 102, B. & C. Comp., set aside and vacated, and he was permitted to answer, for the reason that the judgment was taken against him through mistake, inadvertence and excusable neglect. From this order the plaintiff has appealed, and defendant moves to dismiss such appeal because the order from which it is taken is not appealable.
The statute provides that an appeal may be taken from a “final order affecting a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hume v. BowieSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Deering v. QuiveyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Henrichsen v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carmichael v. CarmichaelOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Abrahamson v. Northwestern Pulp & Paper Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Cotton Mills v. . Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Anderson Cotton Mills v. Royal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hall v. McCanOregon Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.