Legal Opinion
Pauline Sacks v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided December 19, 1978No. 77-1775PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TAMM, Circuit Judge:
Appellants, Pauline Sacks, et al., 1 brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia to recover compensatory and punitive damages from appellees, Reynolds Securities, Inc. (RSI), et al., 2 which allegedly resulted from delay in transferring certain of appellants’ stock accounts. The district court (Waddy, J.) dismissed the complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We find that, although appellants have invoked federal jurisdiction, the factual allegations in their complaint…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Strawbridge v. CurtissSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,451 Jerry Krim, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Banctexas Group, Inc., Banctexas Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Thomas Bernstein v. Lind-Waldock & Company and Chicago Mercantile ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Eleanor Snyder, of the Estate of Leroy Liljedahl v. Bruton SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Chiplin Enterprises, Inc. v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1983
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.