In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ, Justice.
We grant in part plaintiffs’/real party in interests’ motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of July 13, 2000, and substitute this opinion in its place, requiring the trial court to determine the date by which plaintiffs must supplement interrogatory Number 3 propounded by Allied Chemical Corporation. In all other respects, the motion for rehearing is denied.
In this toxic tort suit involving over four hundred plaintiffs and more than fifty defendants, relators, who constitute more than twenty of the defendants, seek mandamus…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Colonial Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Alford Chevrolet-GeoTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Able Supply Co. v. MoyeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Polaris Investment Management Corp. v. AbascalTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Arkansas Health Services Agency v. Desiderata, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- in Re Van Waters & Rogers Inc., F/K/A Vopak USA Inc. & N/K/A Univar USA Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
- in Re: Van Waters & Rogers, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2007