Legal Opinion

In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 8, 2001No. 00-1185PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

The fifteen relators in this original mandamus proceeding are defendants in a seven-year-old mass-tort suit involving 448 plaintiffs. 1 Relators seek relief from the trial court’s orders abating almost all discovery and allowing the plaintiffs’ counsel to pick which plaintiffs’ claims will be tried first. Many of the relators and other defendants who have since settled sought the same relief more than three years ago in mandamus petitions first to the court of appeals, which denied relief without opinion, 2 and then to this Court. We denied relief “without prejudice” to give the trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In Re Colonial Pipeline Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. In Re Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Polaris Investment Management Corp. v. AbascalTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. In Re Ethyl Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In Re Van Waters & Rogers, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re Allied Chemical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2007
  3. In Re Edge Capital Group, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  4. In Re Allied Chemical Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. In Re Allied Chemical Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API