Legal Opinion

Succession of Picard

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 9, 1959No. 43836PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAWTHORNE, Justice.

Canal Assets, Inc., instituted this suit naming as defendants Henry M. Picard, testamentary executor of the succession of Achille I. Picard; 1 Mrs. Beatrix Bahn, widow of Achille Picard; and Leon P. Weil and Henry M. Picard, Jr., legatees. The primary purpose of this suit is to recover judgment in the total amount of a series of notes executed by the decedent. 2

The three notes on which this suit was filed were executed by Achille I. Picard and made payable to the Canal Bank & Trust Co. One note is for the principal sum of $1,450, is dated December 30, 1929, and matured 90…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Scott v. CorkernSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  2. Waterman v. DupeireSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Rawlings v. StokesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. University Lake Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. McGill v. ThigpenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. Osborne v. StoneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. State Ex Rel. Guste v. Estate of HimbertLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. United States Rubber Co. v. BallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API