Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Co. v. Ball

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1963No. 807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Judge.

Plaintiff, United States Rubber Company, instituted this suit against Coco & Fuglaar, Inc., Richard Coco and Mary Ball, seeking a judgment against all of said defendants, in solido, for the principal sum of $14,428.73. Alternatively, plaintiff prays for judgment against Mary Ball decreeing the sale of a business from Coco & Fuglaar, Inc., to the said Miss Ball to be null and void, and decreeing the latter to be liable to plaintiff *204under the Louisiana Bulk Sales Law (LSA-R.S. 9:2961 et seq.). Judgment was rendered by default against the first two named defendants for the amount…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company v. Hattie A. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Succession of PicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. Johnson v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1958
  4. Phillips v. Mid-Continent Life Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schweibish v. Pontchartrain State BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Fidelity Credit Co. v. WinkleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Red Top Gas, Inc. v. Dale Hensley & Fred HawkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  4. United States Rubber Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API