Legal Opinion
McGill v. Thigpen
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2001No. 34,386-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
780 So.2d 1224 (2001)
Dorothy Hughes McGILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Roy E. THIGPEN, III, et al., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 34,386-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
February 28, 2001.
Bethard & Bethard, by James G. Bethard, Coushatta, Counsel for Appellants.
Joey W. Hendrix, Shreveport, Counsel for Appellees.
Before NORRIS, STEWART and PEATROSS, JJ.
STEWART, J.
In this suit to foreclose on immovable property, the trial court sustained an exception of prescription and dismissed the plaintiffs' claims.[1] For the reasons set forth herein, we affirm the trial court's judgment.
FACTS
2Cases cited11 opinions
- First Guaranty Bank v. AlfordSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Scott v. CorkernSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
- Kaplan v. University Lake Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Succession of PicardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- GULF COAST BANK & TRUST v. Donnaud's Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- SECURITY NAT. PART. LTD. PARTNER. v. BaxleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Joshua Inv. Corp. v. HOME SALES COUNSELINGLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- City of Shreveport v. BlackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Howard v. EdmonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Cadlerock Joint Ventures Co. v. J. Graves Scaffolding Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.