Faught v. Faught
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
We note at the outset that defendant has failed to include in his brief exceptions supporting his assignments of error, a violation of Rule 28(b)(5) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Such error normally constitutes an abandonment of the omitted exceptions, but we will consider defendant’s arguments on the merits through our discretionary power under Rule 2 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.
In defendant’s first assignment of error, he contends that the trial judge erred in holding defendant in contempt for his failure to comply with earlier court orders, when defendant lacked…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Williams v. Pilot Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Mauney v. MauneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- In Re Marriage of HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Harrelson Ex Rel. Randolph v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Bennett v. BennettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of MacDonaldWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Edsall v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMAArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Major v. MajorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Morton v. MortonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Keen v. KeenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.