In re Marriage of Peck
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge:
¶ 1 John Peck appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his petition for dissolution on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction over his wife, Sabine Peck. He also contends that, even if jurisdiction was lacking, he was nonetheless “entitled to have an Arizona court terminate his marriage.” For the following reasons, we affirm the conclusion that the court did not have jurisdiction over Sabine,1 but we remand for further proceedings regarding the dissolution of the marriage.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 In reviewing the trial court’s dismissal for lack of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ritchie v. KrasnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.